Monday, December 27, 2010

Black Swan (2010)


Natalie Portman gives an amazing performance in Black Swan, directed by Darren Aronofsky, a creepy psychological thriller that plays as half a horror movie. she's a ballerina who is cast as the lead in Swan Lake, and must figure out how she can play the black swan as well as the white, when in reality she is a frigid, sexually repressed, and mentally unbalanced young woman who is dominated by her mother (Barbara Hershey). Vincent Cassel is the ballet instructor, and Mila Kunis is a fellow ballerina, both of whom awaken her sexual desire. throughout the film she sees things that aren't there and slowly begins losing her mind completely, eventually starting to physically turn into the black swan in a crazy third act. the cinematography is great in this movie, esp in the exhilarating final ballet sequences, and look for Winona Ryder as a retired dancer turned crazy herself. i wouldn't call this the best movie of the year, but it's entertaining and i'd recommend it for natalie's performance, which is much different than anything else she's ever been in. and it definitely keeps you on the edge of your seat and wondering what's going to happen the whole time. if i were to give letter grades i'd give it a solid B+

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Team of Rivals



i just finished this excellent book by Doris Kearns Goodwin, the pulitzer-prize winning historian, about the presidency of Abraham Lincoln and how he managed the Civil War along with the warring members of his Cabinet. it was a GREAT read and moved really fast, even at over 700 pages. it's not a simple biography, because it follows the lives of Lincoln's most important Cabinet members too, Secretary of State William Seward, Treasury Secretary and then Supreme Court Justice Salmon P. Chase, and War Secretary Edwin Stanton, who makes a late entrance but becomes the third most important character, behind Lincoln and Seward.

Lincoln is of course one of the most iconic figures in our history, but after reading this book you come to feel like you know him as a person, how his mind worked, his personality and sense of humor, his deep sense of pragmatism and rationality. he looms as such a myth in history, that i realized i'd never really thought of him as a normal person, more like a giant of some ancient past, who did great things but is  practically looked at as a saint now. requiring no deep understanding, just a sort of hero worship. well, this book made me look at him completely differently. he was a man like anyone else, born with even worse circumstances than most, especially compared to his colleagues, most of whom also ran for the presidential nomination in 1860. born into utter poverty, he was ENTIRELY self-taught, never having received a single day of schooling. from the age of 8 years old, he read anything he could get his hands on, and when he was in his twenties he taught himself the law, by borrowing books from other people. he emerged as a dark horse candidate for the presidency in 1860, still not well-known outside of Illinois, but managed to secure the nomination due to the failure of the other candidates to gather a majority of the delegates.  the votes were split, allowing him to sneak through in an upset win, after years of running for Congress and failing to be elected except for single congressional term in the 1840's. despite Lincoln's lack of education, he emerges as a deeply thoughtful, sympathetic, reasonable and pragmatic politician. what comes across the most frequently is his logic and reasoning. he applies it to every situation, reasoning out what course of action would make the most sense, benefit the most people and advance the cause furthest.

he also had a great sense of humor, surprisingly. he was constantly telling jokes, stories, and anecdotes that were analogous to whatever situation he was facing. Goodwin recounts a lot of the story through letters and correspondence, from Lincoln himself to all the members of his cabinet, plus their wives and family members. most of them kept long, detailed diaries as well, with remembrances from each day. some of Lincoln's own colleagues complained about his constant joke-telling at inappropriate times, while others thought he was hilarious. it's said that his humor kept him from despairing at the constant horrors of the war, which resulted in the deaths of over 650,000 americans, touching the lives of virtually every family in the country at that time.

almost everyone who ever met Lincoln ended up respecting him, thinking him a very intelligent, compassionate and wise man. he never held a grudge against anyone, and always gave someone a second, and even third chance to prove himself, or make up for a mistake. the composition of his own cabinet was made up of everyone who ran against him for the nomination, showing how magnanimous he was, and how important he thought it was to have the very best people for the job, no matter what they might be plotting against him (and some of them still harbored ambitions for the presidency themselves). despite a cabinet filled with strong and warring personalities, Lincoln was always the leader, as they soon came to find out. it was he himself who decided on the most important courses of action during the war, he himself who came up with even the idea for the Emancipation Proclamation, which he hid from the rest of his colleagues until he had already decided to do it. he did make some mistakes, and his willingness to compromise angered a lot of the more radical and anti-southern forces in Congress. at the time, there were a lot more virulently anti-slavery congressmen than i ever knew, and they were constantly pushing Lincoln to be more forceful on the slavery issue. he was always anti-slavery himself, but knew to wait until the time was right and it would directly impact the North's ability to win the war to act on it.

the book is so well-written and descriptive, with so many details of the time that you feel as if you were right there with them, in the room listening to decisions made about the Civil War. you come to know each character so well, as there are random details about their personal lives, their families, and each of their relationships with Lincoln himself. the second most important character is his Secretary of State, Seward, who was once the frontrunner to the nomination and his number one rival, but who soon becomes his closest ally and best friend. the two of them manage every important decision together and spend more time together than even with their families. on the night of Lincoln's assassination, there was also a failed attempt on Seward's life, as well as the vice-president at the time. it was supposed to be a triple assassination coordinated by 3 assassins, in order to take out the whole administration and horrify the North. that night is recounted so vividly it leaves you in breathless suspense, even though you know what ultimately happens.

there's going to be a movie made based on this book, directed by Steven Spielberg and starring Daniel Day-Lewis as Lincoln. it's supposed to come out in 2012 and already i can't wait. 

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Super Lame-Duck

so, this is now the final word on the lame-duck session, and it turns out that i was right. the tax-cut deal paved the way for everything else that passed in the last two weeks, and it was a LOT of stuff: DADT repeal, the START treaty, the food safety bill, the healthcare bill for the 9/11 first responders, etc.

it was a historic session! following on the heels of the historic 111th Congress, actually. it's true, with everything they passed in the last 2 years, a headline on Bloomberg News the other day was "No Congress since the 1960's has had as much impact on the public as the 111th"

and they never would have been able to push all this stuff through if not for that tax-cut compromise Obama made. of course, a big disappointment was the Dream Act, and the lack of any action on immigration reform. if the Dems had held Congress in the elections, i guarantee that it would have passed in the next year. but with the Republicans coming in, that's obviously gonna halt any action on that front, until they can win back a majority, sadly. or until enough republicans can decide it's actually in THEIR best interest as well to do something about immigration, considering how latinos are the fastest growing minority in the country and will undoubtedly be making more and more of an electoral impact in the future. i expect Obama to push for it strongly and publicly, in order to show the latino community exactly who it is that's blocking action on this, and that MAY make a difference, but we'll see.

overall though, i'm pretty happy with the record of accomplishment since '08. it was a lot of stuff! in fact, the 4 main priorities that i personally wanted to see done went 3 for 4. health care reform, wall street reform, and repealing DADT (the other was immigration). it's pretty amazing that those three relatively giant things got done in the first TWO YEARS. the biggest thing that will have an impact on public opinion is the pace of economic recovery, of course. at least until we will actually start seeing the benefits of those other overhauls (the healthcare exchanges open in 2013 and it will take time to set up the WS reforms as well). and the economy was always going to take time. you could argue that the administration should have fought for openly visible courses of action on it, something to similar to the gov't programs that FDR set up in the 30's, like the WPA and CCC. but the investments in the gigantic stimulus package that was passed in '09 did prevent another Great Depression from even happening. and things were THAT bad at the time he took office. the jobs that were lost btw the time he was elected and the time he was inaugurated were huge. and actually, i would also argue that the reason he couldn't set up programs like that was because he DIDN'T have FDR like majorities in Congress. yes he had the full House, but the Senate, where everything goes to die, saw virtually all of his legislation filibustered by the entire Republican caucus, preventing him from the getting the very best stimulative measures possible. i mean, even with the stimulus, just 3 Republicans voted for it- even in the face of the catastrophe the country was facing. and the reason behind that was a bet made by the Republicans that the economy wouldn't be better by 2010, and they could benefit from that in the midterms (which they did). boy, that's really putting your country first, isn't it? anyway, at the time FDR was elected, he had 80 seats in the Senate, not 59, so he really could do whatever he wanted. as a result of that, he GAINED seats in 1934.

so, ultimately, the economy takes time. and the fact is we ARE in a recovery, it's just painful and slow, because the crisis was so bad. but we aren't losing jobs anymore, we're just struggling to get back upwards. and that required more than the 18 months btw the inauguration and the midterms.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

The Fighter (2010)


so, this was a movie that flew off my radar until VERY recently, and then it started suddenly showing up in all the year end award nominations, so i saw it. i was ambivalent about it from the first time i saw the trailer, mainly because it's another in a long series of boxing movies, stretching back to the silent era. the boxing genre is practically as old as film itself, and the best of the bunch will always be Raging Bull (1980) and the original Rocky (1976). i honestly felt that there was literally nothing new or interesting that could be done in another movie about a boxer, even if it was based on a true story. but, The Fighter IS a good movie, and it's a lot more about family drama than it is about boxing. the main character's dream could have been another sport or profession altogether and the movie would still work.

Directed by David O'Russell, it stars Mark Wahlberg as Mickey Ward, an up and coming fighter in the early 90's, who lives under the management of his overbearing mother Alice (Melissa Leo), and is trained by his older brother Dickie (Christian Bale), a local legend in Lowell, MA because he was once a good fighter himself, who managed to knock out Sugar Ray Leonard in the late 70's. now Dickie is a crack addict and a screw-up, yet still manages to impart some decent fighting tips to Mickey once in a while. overall, Mickey is completely dominated by his  obnoxious family (that includes 7 sisters), who manage him badly and are preventing him from moving forward with his talent. then he meets Charlene (Amy Adams), a bartender who sees that his family is the problem and helps him to move forward, ultimately clashing with Alice and Dickie along the way.

The acting is phenomenal in this movie. all the supporting characters shine, but ESPECIALLY Christian Bale as Dickie. Bale has always been a good and somewhat overlooked actor, but here he has finally gotten the part that's garnering him the recognition he deserves. He dominates virtually the entire movie, mastering the mannerisms and behavior of a crack addict, letting everyone down, yet sweet talking his way out of other people's anger with him. Dickie has a kind of tragic story, yet he somehow manages to come across as the funniest and most likeable character in the film. i think i predicted that Geoffrey Rush would win Best Supporting Actor a while ago, but i have to take it back now and say Bale is a lock to win this. he'll get it hands down. and two other actors here will also be nominated, Melissa Leo and Amy Adams. they're both great here as well, and i'd bet that one of them will likely be winning. i'm gonna say Adams for now, because she's more well-known, this role as a trash talking tough girl is a pretty decent stretch for her, and this will be her 3rd nomination in 4 years. Wahlberg as Mickey is fine, but he's pretty much dominated by all the supporting characters, and i think that's the point of Mickey anyway. he lets his family and his handlers walk all over him, can't speak for himself, and they all get in the way of what's supposed to be HIS dream.

The movie is very involving, stylishly directed by O'Russell, excellently portrays a time and place in a rundown, blue collar city and the people who live there....i would highly recommend The Fighter for all the reasons that have nothing to do with boxing.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

DADT Repeal

woo-hoo! the repeal of the discriminatory, 17 year old policy of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" just passed the Senate, by a vote of 65-31. it's now headed to the President's desk!

awesome. it's truly a civil rights victory too. in sad news, the Dream Act failed, again by a MAJORITY vote of 55-41. the worst thing about that one is that 5 conservative Democrats killed it, joining a Republican filibuster. had the dems been able to hold together on this, Dream would have passed too. i think that pretty much halts any action on immigration reform for the next two years, with an incoming Republican House. that sucks.

but overall, the lame duck session of Congress has turned into a VERY productive one, maybe the most productive ever. the tax cuts compromise sailed through (which i didn't hate as much as some other liberals, mainly because it has in there as much of a second stimulus as we're ever going to get, and that makes it badly needed- the price for it was not raising on taxes on the rich, at least not for another two years), and now the DADT repeal. i think the last thing they'll get done is to ratify obama's START treaty, which is the nuclear arms deal with Russia.

but this was definitely a good day.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Quick Update

as of today, the Dream Act has passed the House, while the DADT repeal just failed in the Senate, by a vote of 57-40. yes, you read that right, the repeal FAILED with a 57 vote majority in favor of it.

is that not the most ridiculous thing you've ever heard? it failed because the republicans filibustered, which means that you need 60 votes to pass it, and not a majority. this mass abuse of the filibuster that the republicans have done for virtually everything that's come up in congress since they were kicked into the minority is unprecedented. it's not supposed to be the norm to use the filibuster as though it's an ordinary Senate tool. but for them it's become their only weapon to prevent ANYTHING from actually getting done, even if there's a clear majority in favor if it, like there is for this. the only other time it was abused like this was during the 60s, when the Civil Rights Acts were passing through Congress. Southern Republicans at the time were so viciously against it that they filibustered over and over again to prevent it from happening. and obviously they were acting on behalf of their racist constituents at the time, but this DADT measure? repeal is supported by 75% of the public, the secretary of defense, the joint chiefs of staff, 70% of the troops themselves, etc. it's not controversial anymore, this should NOT be a partisan issue.

it's insane. i repeat my call that we should abolish the Senate, if this is the way the minority party is going to act from now on. it prevents the government from functioning and it's completely wrong.

Monday, December 6, 2010

The Final Deal

so, it appears that the deal will be to extend the tax cuts for everyone for 2 years, in exchange for 13 months of unemployment benefits. it's really sad that extending UI during a recession is now being called a "concession" from the republicans. that move has never been controversial before, in any recession we've had since the Depression.

but if they can repeal DADT, pass the Dream act and the START treaty after doing this, i guess i can live with it. i honestly think it's better than letting taxes go up on everyone and not getting any of the rest of it done.

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Lame Duck Update

so, it looks like tax cuts are dead. on the other hand, MAYBE the dadt repeal will go through. no clue on the Dream Act yet, but i think the vote on that is wednesday.

first of all, the tax cuts. as expected, the House passed the middle class ones only, and the Senate GOP filibustered them. and all of them pledged to not let anything else come to a vote (by filibustering) until their rich people tax cuts are secure. sigh. of course that means they let unemployment benefits expire too, because they don't care about the jobless either.

ok, look. them being assholes and continuing to be assholes is not new, and it leaves the Dems with two options here. 1) stand up and fight for their position on this, forcing them to filibuster this vote until the end of the session. which they will. the consequence of that is pretty bad, because it will never pass. at the end of the year, taxes will go up on EVERYONE, and they never managed to get to anything else, like repealing dadt, extending UI, Dream, etc. so, i honestly think this option is out.

2) pass all the budget-busting unpaid-for tax cuts for 2 years, in return for an extension of unemployment benefits now (hopefully). and the chance to at least get to this other stuff they have to do, and only have a chance of doing before the republicans take over.

so, yeah, it's gonna be option 2. which sucks. it shows them they can effectively blackmail the president to get what they want, so we have more of that bullshit to look forward to. if taxes go up on everyone the republicans don't care, because they know they can blame the democrats and obama for it. and they just don't care about extending jobless benefits because they don't care about the jobless. they have nothing to lose. democrats do care about those things and don't WANT to let taxes go up on everyone, because they know they won't be able to blame republicans for it. i mean, yeah it would be their fault because they successfully held tax cuts for everyone hostage for the benefit of the rich- but no one will care because all they'll see is that taxes went up while the democrats were in charge.

the left has been especially unhappy lately because obama is REALLY falling into the image of a kind of weak, ineffectual leader who just does not stand up for what he believes in. he's not even actively tagging to the right, but is just seemingly drifting, not wanting to say anything or take any clear position- or if he does express an opinion, does NOT appear to fight for it. i don't know what's going on, he seems to be just beaten down by the election and doesn't quite know what to do. the truth is he's never been a big fighter, somebody who LIKES getting into it, fighting with the other side, etc. this has been said about him his whole career, that he's a guy who prefers to veer away from knockdown drag out political fights, always wanting to figure out a way he can actually get something done, get legislation passed, make the compromises to get there, all that stuff.

but the truth is, people respond to strength, no matter what they're actually saying. because most people aren't paying much attention to the issues, but they can tell if someone is standing up for what they believe in, and seems to be taking a clear position on SOMETHING, even if it's a thing they don't really understand. and this is something that i think republicans just get, to the core. they can take highly unpopular positions (tax cuts for the rich is not exactly popular) and they know if they just stand by them and don't let up, they appear to be taking a stand and they get support for doing that. people aren't in tune enough to figure out why they're doing it, they just appear to be doing something.

and the white house needs to wake up and realize that they have got to be perceived as standing up clearly for SOMETHING at some point.